The Blue Cave might be better in ranch-style houses than more vertically-oriented homes. The audio and video ran skip-free and the router ran for a week without a problem.Īlong the way, it used 12.7 watts of power, adding up to an annual power bill of about $14.50 if you pay the national average of 13 cents per kilowatt-hour of electricity. The router did well on our informal saturation test where I listened to internet radio on a Surface Pro 3 while watching videos on a Macbook Air and iPad Pro as a Samsung Tab Pro S moved data onto and off of a networked storage system. It was able to stay in contact with my iPad Pro for 125-feet. The Blue Cave's range fell short in my 3,500-square foot home as well, leaving several places where Wi-Fi didn’t reach. In other words, the Blue Cave might be better in ranch-style houses than more vertically-oriented homes. When it was required to jump floors, the Blue Cave was able to distribute only 132.3 Mbps on the second floor, one-quarter the 629.8Mbps that the TP-Link Archer C2300 moved. MORE: Best Wireless Router - Routers for Strong, Long Range Wi-Fiīut it was on the test where the router’s signal needs to travel upstairs that Blue Cave fell short. By the same token, the Blue Cave managed to push 468.5 Mbps through a soundboard covered wall, versus the TP-Link Archer C2300 (921.7 Mbps) and the Norton Core (700.0 Mbps). For instance, the Blue Cave mustered 488.9 Mbps of available bandwidth on the other side of a metal wall, 28 percent below the Norton Core (662.6 Mbps). On the other hand, it faltered when it came to our testing with real-world construction materials. Clearly, the Blue Cave is the long-distance runner of home Wi-Fi routers. This trailed the TP-Link Archer C2300’s 682.3 Mbps, 913.8 Mbps and 613.2 Mbps and Norton Core’s 654.7 Mbps, 601.2 Mbps and 483.8 Mbps throughput at the same distances.Īt 150 feet, the Blue Cave came into its own, with a throughput of 437.1 Mbps, easily beating the Norton Core’s 384.1 Mbps and TP-Link Archer C2300’s 342.5 Mbps. The Blue Cave’s available bandwidth declined at 15 feet, 50 feet and 100 feet to 425.6 Mbps, 376.7 Mbps and 398.8 Mbps, respectively. The Blue Cave topped out at delivering 439.1 Mbps 5 feet from the router, less than half the output of the TP-Link Archer C2300 (963.6 Mbps). This means that in the real world, where the router and clients are often far apart, it excels when others peter out. Using Ixia’s IxChariot benchmarking software at our Utah lab, the Blue Cave proved to be a mediocre performer at short range, but gained strength at longer ranges. The Blue Cave is the long-distance runner of home Wi-Fi routers. It can handle up to 128 individual clients at once and uses dynamic bandwidth control. Inside, the Blue Cave has Intel’s WAV514 Wi-Fi chip uses MU-MIMO for satisfying several devices and advanced beam-forming for customizing the signal to the needs of each receiver.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |